Standard Refill Cartridge
Refill cartridge · up to 4 monthsSuppliesScored October 2026
- Flags
- 11 caution
- Ingredients
- 2all in our library
- Brand grade
- Ctransparency, costs 5 points
- Recalls
- 0linked to this product
Save it to your pantry and the pantry page flags it if it turns up in an FDA recall we import.
It adds up, line by line.
Every product starts at 96. Flags, the brand's transparency grade and any recall linked to this product take points away. Nothing else moves the number, and no brand can pay to move it.
Tap a line on the receipt to see which ingredients caused it.
The full methodologyLitter Genie
Standard Refill Cartridge
Good, check the flags
Scored October 2026 · checkthepanel.com
1 flagged ingredient.
Avoid first. Each flag costs points in the score above; where a flag has an entry behind it, it links to the evidence.
Undisclosed material
The maker doesn't say what this part is made of, so there is nothing to look up; the flag is about the missing name, not a known hazard.
Every ingredient, top to bottom.
Listed as printed on the package. Tap any line to see what it is and why it's there.
2 ingredients. All of them carry this product's flag and are marked below.
- 0225% post-consumer recycled content, a claim, not an ingredient
Recall record.
This product
None linked
We link recalls by hand from FDA notices. Only a recall linked to this product counts in its score.
See all pet recallsLitter Genie, the brand
No FDA recalls on fileNone of the FDA recall notices we have imported names Litter Genie.
The brand behind it.
Litter Genie
Litter disposal pails and refills. Graded from what the packaging states, not from an audit of the company.
Describes the refill film as a seven-layer barrier with 25% recycled content and an unnamed antimicrobial; the pail's own plastic is not specified. The C grade takes 5 points off this product's score.
Litter Genie brand pageMore Litter Genie supplies
Panel Score 87 out of 100, grade B: Good, check the flags
Plus Litter Disposal PailIndependent testing & contaminants
No independent testing on file.
Third-party lab findings for things that never appear on an ingredient label. This is separate from the score above and does not change it.
We haven't found published third-party lab results (PFAS, heavy metals, phthalates) for this product. That is not a clean bill of health, just an absence of data.
What we look forThis page was corrected once.
- Oct 13, 2026 The page now shows Panel Score 87 instead of Not enough data, with a caution for Undisclosed material. The refill's film and its antimicrobial additive are described without being named, so they carry the caution for a material the maker doesn't name, which is about the missing name, not a known hazard. The line giving the film's recycled content describes the film, and no longer counts as a material.
Holding the package and it reads differently? Disputes come straight to us, and any score we change is logged publicly on the corrections page.