Organics Jasmine + Lily Oatmeal Shampoo
Shampoo · 12 oz bottleGroomingScored October 2026
- Flags
- 22 caution
- Ingredients
- 11all in our library
- Brand grade
- Atransparency, costs nothing
- Recalls
- 0linked to this product
Save it to your pantry and the pantry page flags it if it turns up in an FDA recall we import.
It adds up, line by line.
Every product starts at 96. Flags, the brand's transparency grade and any recall linked to this product take points away. Nothing else moves the number, and no brand can pay to move it.
Tap a line on the receipt to see which ingredients caused it.
The full methodologykin+kind
Organics Jasmine + Lily Oatmeal Shampoo
Good, check the flags
Scored October 2026 · checkthepanel.com
2 flagged ingredients.
Avoid first. Each flag costs points in the score above; where a flag has an entry behind it, it links to the evidence.
Fragrance
One word that can legally hide dozens of undisclosed compounds; a common trigger for skin and airway irritation.
Cosmetic preservatives
Includes formaldehyde releasers and potent contact allergens worth knowing by name.
Every ingredient, top to bottom.
Listed as printed on the package. Tap any line to see what it is and why it's there.
11 ingredients. 3 of them carry this product's 2 flags and are marked below. The other 8 raised no flag.
Recall record.
This product
None linked
We link recalls by hand from FDA notices. Only a recall linked to this product counts in its score.
See all pet recallskin+kind, the brand
No FDA recalls on fileNone of the FDA recall notices we have imported names kin+kind.
The brand behind it.
kin+kind
Natural, organic-based saponified-oil shampoos; the scented versions use a fragrance blend the unscented oatmeal skips. Its website is now a domain for sale, so this record can't be read again there.
USDA-certified-organic base oils, sulfate- and paraben-free; the scented formulas add a "fragrance" blend. The A grade takes nothing off this product's score.
kin+kind brand pageIndependent testing & contaminants
No independent testing on file.
Third-party lab findings for things that never appear on an ingredient label. This is separate from the score above and does not change it.
We haven't found published third-party lab results (PFAS, heavy metals, phthalates) for this product. That is not a clean bill of health, just an absence of data.
What we look forCleaner picks in grooming.
Cleaner picks are the highest-scoring products in the same category that suit the same animal. No affiliate links, no paid placement.
This page was corrected once.
- Oct 24, 2026 Panel Score 92 → 88: added a caution for Cosmetic preservatives. The panel lists caprylhydroxamic acid and glyceryl caprylate, the preservative pair in this shampoo, and the record was not carrying the flag.
Holding the package and it reads differently? Disputes come straight to us, and any score we change is logged publicly on the corrections page.