UltraGuard Plus Flea & Tick Spray for Dogs
Pump spray · 16 fl ozFlea & tickScored October 2026
- Flags
- 22 caution
- Ingredients
- 3all in our library
- Brand grade
- Ctransparency, costs 5 points
- Recalls
- 0linked to this product
Save it to your pantry and the pantry page flags it if it turns up in an FDA recall we import.
It adds up, line by line.
Every product starts at 96. Flags, the brand's transparency grade and any recall linked to this product take points away. Nothing else moves the number, and no brand can pay to move it.
Tap a line on the receipt to see which ingredients caused it.
The full methodologyHartz
UltraGuard Plus Flea & Tick Spray for Dogs
Good, check the flags
Scored October 2026 · checkthepanel.com
2 flagged ingredients.
Avoid first. Each flag costs points in the score above; where a flag has an entry behind it, it links to the evidence.
Pesticide actives
Printed as actives: tetrachlorvinphos 1.08% and (S)-Methoprene 0.07%. Labelled for dogs.
Undisclosed material
The label totals everything besides the actives as one share without naming it, so there is nothing to look up; the flag is about the missing names, not a known hazard.
Every ingredient, top to bottom.
Listed as printed on the package. Tap any line to see what it is and why it's there.
3 ingredients. All of them carry this product's 2 flags and are marked below.
Checked against the brand's own page on Oct 17, 2026. A package on the shelf can be older or newer than that page; trust the one in your hand.
Recall record.
This product
None linked
We link recalls by hand from FDA notices. Only a recall linked to this product counts in its score.
See all pet recallsHartz, the brand
No FDA recalls on fileNone of the FDA recall notices we have imported names Hartz.
The brand behind it.
Hartz
Flea and tick collars, sprays and shampoos. Graded from the 3 products of theirs in this catalogue, not from an audit of the company.
Two of the 3 products we hold name their actives and give the rest as one unnamed share; the minimum-risk shampoo names every ingredient. All three panels were read from label photos on its product pages, which print no ingredient statement in text. The C grade takes 5 points off this product's score.
Hartz brand pageIndependent testing & contaminants
No independent testing on file.
Third-party lab findings for things that never appear on an ingredient label. This is separate from the score above and does not change it.
We haven't found published third-party lab results (PFAS, heavy metals, phthalates) for this product. That is not a clean bill of health, just an absence of data.
What we look forNo corrections on this page yet.
Holding the package and it reads differently? Disputes come straight to us, and any score we change is logged publicly on the corrections page.
