Sifting Cat Litter Pan
Litter pan · largeSuppliesScored October 2026
- Flags
- 11 caution
- Ingredients
- 1all in our library
- Brand grade
- Ctransparency, costs 5 points
- Recalls
- 0linked to this product
Save it to your pantry and the pantry page flags it if it turns up in an FDA recall we import.
It adds up, line by line.
Every product starts at 96. Flags, the brand's transparency grade and any recall linked to this product take points away. Nothing else moves the number, and no brand can pay to move it.
Tap a line on the receipt to see which ingredients caused it.
The full methodologyVan Ness
Sifting Cat Litter Pan
Good, check the flags
Scored October 2026 · checkthepanel.com
1 flagged ingredient.
Avoid first. Each flag costs points in the score above; where a flag has an entry behind it, it links to the evidence.
Undisclosed material
The maker doesn't say what this part is made of, so there is nothing to look up; the flag is about the missing name, not a known hazard.
Every ingredient, top to bottom.
Listed as printed on the package. Tap any line to see what it is and why it's there.
1 ingredient. It carries this product's flag and is marked below.
Recall record.
This product
None linked
We link recalls by hand from FDA notices. Only a recall linked to this product counts in its score.
See all pet recallsVan Ness, the brand
No FDA recalls on fileNone of the FDA recall notices we have imported names Van Ness.
The brand behind it.
Van Ness
Litter pans and pet housewares. Graded from what the packaging states, not from an audit of the company.
Says "BPA-free plastic" and stops there: the polymer is never named, so there is nothing to check. The C grade takes 5 points off this product's score.
Van Ness brand pageIndependent testing & contaminants
No independent testing on file.
Third-party lab findings for things that never appear on an ingredient label. This is separate from the score above and does not change it.
We haven't found published third-party lab results (PFAS, heavy metals, phthalates) for this product. That is not a clean bill of health, just an absence of data.
What we look forCleaner picks in supplies.
Cleaner picks are the highest-scoring products in the same category that suit the same animal. No affiliate links, no paid placement.
This page was corrected once.
- Oct 13, 2026 The page now shows Panel Score 87 instead of Not enough data, with a caution for Undisclosed material. Its one line, “BPA-free plastic (polymer not named)”, was read as a marketing claim, so the record had no ingredient lines to score. It is now read as a material. Van Ness doesn't say which plastic it is, on its product pages or in its catalog, so the line carries the caution for a material the maker doesn't name. It is about the missing name, not a known hazard.
Holding the tray and it reads differently? Disputes come straight to us, and any score we change is logged publicly on the corrections page.